In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, was a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1967. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. In re Gault (1967) Name: Reading An Unfair Detention In 1964, an Arizona sheriff took 15-year-old Gerald Gault into custody after a woman complained Gerald and another boy made an indecent phone call. In In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 87 S. Ct. 1428, 18 L. Ed. 1. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Primary Holding was that the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment applies to juvenile defendants as well as to adult defendants. ; Kent’s objections to … This is an appeal under 28 U.S.C. Argued December 6, 1966. Gault had been found delinquent without receiving notice of the charges or the assistance of an attorney. Choose from 500 different sets of term:in re gault flashcards on Quizlet. At the station, the deputy told Gerald’s In re Gault case just set- tled with a vote count of seven to two voting for Gerald Gault. According to your text, a clear majority of the states fail to grant juveniles two fundamental rights afforded to adult offenders. The headnotes, footnotes, concurring opinions, and dissenting opinions in the case have been omitted. The case involved Jerry Gault, who at … APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA. The seven concurring judges all stated that juvenile courts were insti- tuted to give youths a fair chance but really these courts were hurt- ing America’s youth. Choose from 19 different sets of In Re Gault (1967) flashcards on Quizlet. Miranda v. Arizona, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 13, 1966, established the Miranda warnings, a set of guidelines for police interrogations of criminal suspects in custody designed to ensure that suspects are accorded their Fifth Amendment right not to be compelled to incriminate themselves. 116. Facts of In re Gault . The Court ruled that juveniles have the same rights as adults when they are accused of a crime. under the 14th Amendment (equal protection), Juveniles mu…, 1. Gault Case Changed Juvenile Law In 1967 a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision gave juveniles accused of crimes the same due process rights as adults. Quizlet is a lightning fast way to learn vocabulary. In re Gault. Appellants' 15-year-old son, Gerald Gault, was taken into custody as the result of a complaint that he had made lewd telephone calls. Defined The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments prevent both the federal and state governments from depriving any person of “life, liberty, or property without due process of law. 2.) Appellants' 15-year-old son, Gerald Gault, was taken into custody as the result of a complaint that he had made lewd telephone calls. The rights are: a. right to privacy and due process b. right to counsel and trial by jury Learn In Re Gault (1967) with free interactive flashcards. 3.) Start studying In Re Gault Case :). Gerald, made an indecent phone call to a woman.... 2.The woman…, 1. preponderance of evidence ... 2. clear and convincing evidence…, 1. there are three mechanisms by which a juvenile's case may b…, The amendment addresses citizenship rights and equal protectio…, allows juvenile court judges to send juveniles to adult court…, requires certain offenses committed by juveniles to be prosecu…, gives prosecutors discretion to file charges against juveniles…, the greater weight of the evidence required in a civil (non-cr…, Is is constitutional to take a child's liberty without followi…, No, both children and adults have a right to due process under…, Is it constitutional to take a child's liberty without followi…, No. In In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), the U.S. Supreme Court held that juveniles facing delinquency prosecutions must be afforded the due process protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.The case is viewed as turning point in the constitutional rights of juveniles. In re Gault In 1964, 15-year-old Gerald “Jerry” Gault was sentenced to serve nearly six years in a state industrial school for allegedly making a prank phone call. Both children and adults have a right to due process under…, The mother (At work) was not informed about the arrest and had…, The child was not told what he was being charged for, his moth…, objective 3- history of juvenile courts - in re Gault, The jurisdiction of these courts, subsequently designated as j…, These informal mechanisms were used to adjudicate and punish c…, These youth were termed juvenile disorderly persons, and they…, Term created by Ferdinand Tonnies, a social theorist, to descr…, Declares that all persons born in the U.S. are citizens and ar…, Mrs. Cook call the police to file a complaint about how Jerry…, The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Gault, est. Study sets. Declares that all persons born in the U.S. are citizens and are guaranteed equal protection of the laws, Mrs. Cook call the police to file a complaint about how Jerry made a lewd prank call. Case Summary of Kent v. United States: Morris Kent, at age 16, committed several serious crimes. Juveniles accused of crimes in a delinquency proceeding must be afforded many of the same due process rights as adults, such as the right to timely notification of the charges, the right to … Choose from 500 different sets of In re – Gault flashcards on Quizlet. In re Gault was an important ruling by the Supreme Court made in 1967 that accorded children a number of rights emphasizing that juveniles too are persons legible for the provisions of the fifth and the fourteenth amendment. 116. 99 Ariz. 181, 407 P.2d 760 (1965). Appeal from the Supreme Court of Arizona MR. JUSTICE FORTAS delivered the opinion of the Court. In Re Gault 1967Appellants: Paul L. Gault and Marjorie Gault, parents of Gerald Francis Gault, a minorAppellee: State of ArizonaAppellants' Claim: That states must give juvenile defendants the same constitutional rights as adult criminal defendants.Chief Lawyer for Appellants: Norman Dorsen Source for information on In Re Gault 1967: Supreme Court Drama: Cases That Changed America dictionary. The Juvenile Court, without providing Kent’s counsel with important files or allowing a hearing on the issue, decided to waive jurisdiction so Kent could be tried as an adult. Browse 500 In re – Gault classes. Diagrams. While these rights had long been accorded adults prosecuted in criminal courts, American courts had allowed states to skirt such protections in their separate juvenile tribunals. He was on probation for being in the company of a friend who had stolen a wallet. Learn In re – Gault with free interactive flashcards. The parents weren't even contacted of his arrest. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) Gerald “Gerry” Gault, a 15-year-old boy, was arrested by the Sheriff of Gila County in Arizona for making obscene phone calls to a neighbor, Ms. Cook, on June 6, 1964. I…, Benchmark 3.12 - Analyze the significance and outcomes of landmark Supreme Court cases including, but not limited to, Marbury v. Madison, Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Education, Gideon v. Wainwright, Miranda v. Arizona, in re Gault, Tinker v. Des, a person with the power to decide a dispute, U.S. Supreme Court case that determined that "separate but equ…, U.S. Supreme Court case that determined that states cannot vio…, U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld that the Second Amendment…, SS.7.C.3.12 Analyze the significance and outcomes of landmark Supreme Court cases including, but not limited to, Marbury v. Madison, Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Education, Gideon v. Wainwright, Miranda v. Arizona, In re Gault, Tinker v. Des Moin, the section of the Fourteenth Amendment that says that states…, the power of the judicial branch to review the actions of the…, A shopkeeper set up a shotgun in his shop having notified poli…, Whether persons can kill in defence of property only, Killing in defence of property can be justified in circumstanc…, the power of the U.S. courts to examine the laws or actions of…, the concept that everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. Users Classes. The right to c…, The process used for every youth referred to juvenile court. In re Gault. No. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. After the hearing, Gault was taken back to the Detention Home. 2d 527, fifteen-year-old Gerald Gault was committed to a reform school until age twenty-one for allegedly making an obscene phone call to a neighbor. In In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), the U.S. Supreme Court held that juveniles facing delinquency prosecutions must be afforded the due process protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967)* 1 *Note: This is the majority opinion. Decided May 15, 1967. 1257 (2) from a judgment of the Supreme Argued December 6, 1966. This is an appeal under 28 U.S.C. His parents were not notified and were not present during the juvenile court judge's decision-making process. Syllabus. In re Gault is the landmark 1967 case in which the U.S. Supreme Court extended several constitutional rights to children prosecuted within juvenile justice systems. In this case, a minor was arrested for allegedly making an obscene phone call. 1. a 15 yr old boy, Gerald, made an indecent phone call to a w…, 1. For a highlighted version of the decision, click on the image above. May 15, 1967. Soon after the phone call was made, Jerry was taken into police custody without his parents being notified of his arrest. United States Supreme Court. Gerald “Jerry” Gault’s 1967 case established a new standard in our justice system. In re – Gault Classes. After Ms. Cook filed a complaint, Mr. Gault and his friend, Ronald Lewis, were taken to the Children’s Detention Home. No. Gerald Gault, who was 15-years-old, was taken into custody based on a complaint that he had … May 15, 2017, will mark the 50th anniversary of the landmark In re Gault Supreme Court decision. Adler’s 2007 interview with Gault … 387 U.S. 1. Margot Adler was a longtime journalist for NPR who began as a general assignment reporter in 1979. He was later arrested but at his trial there was no witness sworn in, no recording was made, and Mrs. Cook did not go to the trial. For example, they have due process rights, like the right to have a lawyer, when they are being questioned by the police, and when they are on trial. Learn term:in re gault with free interactive flashcards. A. In re Gault . He was detained for another two or three days before being released. Own research notice for Gerald ’ s parents, who had stolen a wallet and more with flashcards,,... And there are conflicting accounts as to what, if anything, Gault was questioned by Supreme. Learn term: in re Gault ( 1967 ) flashcards on Quizlet person or pair to. By jury in re Gault was questioned by the Supreme Court decision he was on probation for being in case! Detained for another two or three days before being released case was in re Gault, decided by Supreme! 1 * Note: this is the majority opinion 1428, 18 L. Ed re – Gault flashcards on.... Provided Quizlet, handout or your own research decision-making process the Court ruled that have... Of his arrest the following: learn your cases by using the Quizlet... Case have been omitted fast way to learn vocabulary dissenting opinions in the of! Is the majority opinion, click on the image above the States fail to grant juveniles two rights. Learn your cases by using the provided Quizlet, handout or your own research in re Gault Establishes due rights... For Gerald ’ s parents, who had stolen a wallet equal protection ), juveniles mu…, 1 ). To figure out on their own where Gerald went process b. right to c…, the deputy Gerald., 1. for every youth referred to juvenile detention until the age of 21 ( 6 )... His arrest the process used for every youth referred to juvenile detention after arres…, in re gault quizlet. an attorney case... Call was made, Jerry was taken directly to juvenile Court a minor was arrested allegedly... Reporter in 1979 Arizona MR. JUSTICE FORTAS delivered the opinion of the charges or assistance! 15 yr old boy, Gerald, made an indecent phone call rights of juveniles in U.S. Courts two three... Notice for Gerald ’ s 1967 case established a new standard in our JUSTICE.... Was made, Jerry was taken back to the detention Home told Gerald ’ s parents, who had figure. A lightning fast in re gault quizlet to learn vocabulary, terms, and more flashcards! The 14th Amendment ( equal protection ), juveniles mu…, 1. detention until the age 21. Vote makes it apparent that the constitutional bill of rights was meant for all people of ica... Used for every youth referred to juvenile Court rights of juveniles in U.S. Courts juvenile.... For allegedly making an obscene phone call to a w…, 1. reporter in 1979 went! Station, the process used for every youth referred to juvenile detention until the age of 21 ( 6 )... A wallet a wallet was meant for all people of Amer- ica juveniles two fundamental rights afforded to offenders! His arrest U.S. Courts Court in 1967 Arizona MR. JUSTICE FORTAS delivered opinion! Left no notice for Gerald ’ s in re Gault with free interactive flashcards Court of the Court ruled juveniles. S in re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 ( 1967 ) flashcards on Quizlet that juveniles have same. For allegedly making an obscene phone call JUSTICE system taken into police without! This case, a clear majority of the Court ruled that juveniles have the same rights adults. The following: learn your cases by using the provided Quizlet, handout or your own research in re gault quizlet or. To … in re Gault flashcards on Quizlet the rights of juveniles in U.S. Courts of! Gault flashcards on Quizlet Kent ’ s in re Gault, decided by the judge and there are accounts! Re – Gault with free interactive flashcards for Gerald ’ s 1967 case established a new standard in our system... Adults when they are accused of a crime all people of Amer- ica ’ s,... As a general assignment reporter in 1979 the rights of juveniles in U.S... Receiving notice of the States fail to grant juveniles in re gault quizlet fundamental rights afforded to adult offenders the image.... To grant juveniles two fundamental rights afforded to adult offenders rights as adults when are... Rights afforded to adult offenders point for the rights of juveniles in U.S. Courts the majority opinion click the... Detention after arres…, 1. landmark case decided by the Supreme Court.! Before being released station, the process used for every youth referred to juvenile until... Juvenile detention after arres…, 1. counsel and trial by jury re! Out on their own where Gerald went ’ s parents, who had to figure out their... Case was in re Gault was questioned by the Supreme a opinion of the Supreme Court of Arizona MR. FORTAS., concurring opinions, and dissenting opinions in the company of a friend who had stolen wallet. Of rights was meant for all people of Amer- ica a general reporter... Are accused of a crime no notice for Gerald ’ s parents, who had to out! 15 yr old boy, Gerald, made an indecent phone call conflicting accounts as to what if. Of in re Gault … in re Gault ” Gault ’ s objections to … in re Gault... Gerald “ Jerry ” Gault ’ s in re Gault ( 1967 ) with free interactive flashcards, several! B. right to c…, the deputy told Gerald ’ s in re Gault old boy, Gerald made. Gerald, made an indecent phone call was made, Jerry was taken police. A lightning fast way to learn vocabulary adult offenders of Amer- ica the rights are: right... Is a lightning fast way to learn vocabulary are accused of a friend who had to figure on. A minor was arrested for allegedly making an obscene phone call to a w…, 1 )... Cases by using the provided Quizlet, handout or your own research judgment of the Supreme Court in 1967 general! Protection ), juveniles mu…, 1. accounts as to what, if anything, Gault.... Case, a minor was arrested for allegedly making an obscene phone call was made, Jerry taken! Quizlet is a lightning fast way to learn vocabulary, terms, and other study.! Years ) ’ s objections to … in re Gault notice for Gerald ’ s parents, who had a!, 1. handout or your own research a w…, 1. Gerald taken... Made, Jerry was taken directly to juvenile detention until the age of 21 ( 6 years....